CHARU KISHOR MEHTA vs MR. PRBODH MEHTA and ORS. Advocate - VIDHII PARTNERS, R.NO. 1,GOVERNMENT PLEADER,R.NO. 2 AND 3 — WP/11835/2012
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010502612012
Filing Number
WP/34320/2012
Filing Date
11-Dec-2012
Registration No
WP/11835/2012
Registration Date
14-Dec-2012
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 03-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHARU KISHOR MEHTA
Adv. M/S. THAKORE JARIWALA and ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. PRBODH MEHTA and ORS. Advocate - VIDHII PARTNERS, R.NO. 1,GOVERNMENT PLEADER,R.NO. 2 AND 3
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an interlocutory order under Section 41D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, finding it moot since the underlying main application under Section 41A had already been decided during the petition's pendency, leaving no substantive issue to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jan-2013
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. GavaiView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
For Admission - Circulation CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai
-
21-Jan-2013
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai
-
09-Jan-2013
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. GavaiView PDF
-
09-Jan-2013
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai
-
19-Dec-2012
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. DharmadhikariView PDF
-
19-Dec-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2012
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11835/2012
The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an interlocutory order under Section 41D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, finding it moot since the underlying main application under Section 41A had already been decided during the petition's pendency, leaving no substantive issue to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts