SWASTIK CHAMBERS OWNERS CO OP SOC LTD vs THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS Advocate - SANTOSH MORE, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL — WP/13274/2025

Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010496942025

Filing Number

WP/31334/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

WP/13274/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Ownership Flats Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWASTIK CHAMBERS OWNERS CO OP SOC LTD

    Adv. Priyanka Bhadrashete

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS Advocate - SANTOSH MORE, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL

  2. 2.THE CORPORATE PARK BUSINESS PREMISES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD

    Adv. H R PAWAR

  3. 3.SHREE CORPORATE PARK-II PREMISES CO-OP.SOCIETY LTD

  4. 4.RELIANCE CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD

  5. 5.RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD

  6. 6.APTE AMALGAMATIONS LTD

  7. 7.LOONKAR BUILDERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, THRO ITS PARTNER MR RAMESH SHAH

  8. 8.M/S SUMMER-VILLA INVESTMENTS, PARTNERSHIP FIRM

  9. 9.THE SUB REGISTRAR OF ASSURANCES (CLASS-II)KURLA (W)

  10. 10.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDING PROPOSAL, EASTERN SUBURBAN, MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  11. 11.AMBEDKAR BHAVAN, SWASTIK MILL COMPOUND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court quashed a February 28, 2020 order granting deemed conveyance to a cooperative society, finding the District Deputy Registrar lacked authority to reopen and enlarge a concluded proceeding based on an earlier February 7, 2019 order. The court held that once a matter is finally decided, the authority cannot pass a second order substantially changing the result without a fresh lawful proceeding, and ordered the officer to pay ₹50,000 in costs for reckless exercise of statutory power. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  15. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13274/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court quashed a February 28, 2020 order granting deemed conveyance to a cooperative society, finding the District Deputy Registrar lacked authority to reopen and enlarge a concluded proceeding based on an earlier February 7, 2019 order. The court held that once a matter is finally decided, the authority cannot pass a second order substantially changing the result without a fresh lawful proceeding, and ordered the officer to pay ₹50,000 in costs for reckless exercise of statutory power. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case