SHIVAJI SHABA KUSALE AND ANR vs GAVKAMGAR TALATHI SAJJA NIMGAON MHALUNGI TAL SHIRUR, DIST. PUNE AND ORS — WP/12504/2024
Case under Mah. Resettlement of Project Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010494252023
Filing Number
WP/29378/2023
Filing Date
25-Oct-2023
Registration No
WP/12504/2024
Registration Date
02-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVAJI SHABA KUSALE AND ANR
Adv. NITIN PADMAKAR DESHPANDE
-
2.DNYANESHWAR NAMDEV KUSALE THR. POA GANESH BABAN SHIRKE
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAVKAMGAR TALATHI SAJJA NIMGAON MHALUNGI TAL SHIRUR, DIST. PUNE AND ORS
-
2.THE CIRCLE OFFICER
-
3.TAHSILDAR SHIRUR
-
4.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PUNE SUB-DIVISION
-
5.DISTRICT REHABILITATION OFFICER
-
6.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR
-
7.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER
-
8.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Shivaji Shaba Kusale and another. The court found that the problematic endorsement on the Revenue Record maintained by the Rehabilitation Officer, Chaskaman Dam Project, had been removed and the necessary corrective entry had been incorporated into the record. Accordingly, the petitioner's grievance was resolved and the petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
-Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
-For Directions
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
-Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
-Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF
-
27-Sep-2024
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
20-Sep-2024
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
26-Aug-2024
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)
-
26-Aug-2024
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)
-
26-Aug-2024
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)
-
09-Aug-2024
Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP/12504/2024
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Shivaji Shaba Kusale and another. The court found that the problematic endorsement on the Revenue Record maintained by the Rehabilitation Officer, Chaskaman Dam Project, had been removed and the necessary corrective entry had been incorporated into the record. Accordingly, the petitioner's grievance was resolved and the petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts