RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MUMBAI vs MOHD. IQBAL SYED NABI AND ANR. — IA/3860/2023
Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010485842022
Filing Number
IA/28746/2022
Filing Date
21-Nov-2022
Registration No
IA/3860/2023
Registration Date
18-Apr-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
MOTOR ACIDENT CLAIM MATTERS DEATH ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MUMBAI
Adv. KALPANA TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHD. IQBAL SYED NABI AND ANR.
-
2.SULEMAN KHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jul-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Reliance General Insurance's appeal under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, finding no substantial questions of law. The court rejected the insurance company's challenges regarding the tribunal's findings on the allegedly fake policy (noting the 5-year delay in lodging a police complaint undermined credibility) and the acceptance of a disability certificate from a non-treating doctor (finding no statutory requirement for a treating physician's certificate). The interim application was allowed, staying the impugned order pending appeal disposal after the insurance company deposited the awarded amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. IA/3860/2023
The Bombay High Court dismissed Reliance General Insurance's appeal under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, finding no substantial questions of law. The court rejected the insurance company's challenges regarding the tribunal's findings on the allegedly fake policy (noting the 5-year delay in lodging a police complaint undermined credibility) and the acceptance of a disability certificate from a non-treating doctor (finding no statutory requirement for a treating physician's certificate). The interim application was allowed, staying the impugned order pending appeal disposal after the insurance company deposited the awarded amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts