ANUP ANIL GOGATE vs KSHITIJA ANUP GOGATE Advocate - NITIN PADMAKAR DESHPANDE, HAARSH KATARIA — HCBM10479872025
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 31. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010479872025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-09-2025
Filing Number
WP/18191/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Habeas Corpus ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANUP ANIL GOGATE
Adv. ABHIJIT DILIP SARWATE
Respondent(s)
KSHITIJA ANUP GOGATE Advocate - NITIN PADMAKAR DESHPANDE, HAARSH KATARIA
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ALANKAR POLICE STATION PUNE THROUGH SENIOR PI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-09-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 09-10-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 11-11-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 26-11-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 03-12-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary In this habeas corpus petition by father Anup Anil Gogate regarding access to his 11-year-old son, the Bombay High Court (29 April 2026) adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026. The court interviewed the child privately and found him intelligent and happy living with his mother (Respondent Kshitija Anup Gogate); the child expressed unwillingness to relocate to Singapore with his father. The court directed that the petitioner's pending application for vacation access be decided by the Family Court on its own merits according to the child's best interests, without influence from this petition, and ordered the petitioner's counsel to withdraw certain paragraphs from the Family Court application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this habeas corpus petition by father Anup Anil Gogate regarding access to his 11-year-old son, the Bombay High Court (29 April 2026) adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026. The court interviewed the child privately and found him intelligent and happy living with his mother (Respondent Kshitija Anup Gogate); the child expressed unwillingness to relocate to Singapore with his father. The court directed that the petitioner's pending application for vacation access be decided by the Family Court on its own merits according to the child's best interests, without influence from this petition, and ordered the petitioner's counsel to withdraw certain paragraphs from the Family Court application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts