Hemant Shantaram Pikale vs Family Care Hospitals Limited Advocate - PRAKRUTI JOSHI — WP/15442/2025
Case under Rent Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010477922025
e-Filing Number
03-09-2025
Filing Number
WP/30221/2025
Filing Date
09-09-2025
Registration No
WP/15442/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hemant Shantaram Pikale
Adv. Indrajeet Hingane
Respondent(s)
Family Care Hospitals Limited Advocate - PRAKRUTI JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-11-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 24-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/15442/2025 - Hemant Shantaram Pikale v. Family Care Hospitals Limited Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition and struck off the defendant's defense in a leave-and-license eviction suit. The court held that Family Care Hospitals' refusal to deposit Rs. 3,67,73,382 in arrears of license fees despite court orders—upheld through multiple appellate levels and by the Supreme Court—justified the drastic remedy of striking off defense under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. Key Reasoning: The court found that the Trial and Appellate Courts erred by citing pendency of revision proceedings and execution proceedings as reasons to reject the striking-off application. The court emphasized that once the deposit obligation attained finality (after Supreme Court dismissal on 18 October 2024), and the deadline of 30 September 2024 passed without compliance, the plaintiff acquired a right to striking off. Given the suit's seven-year pendency and the Supreme Court's direction to expedite hearing, relegating the matter back to the Trial Court would cause further delays contrary to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/15442/2025 - Hemant Shantaram Pikale v. Family Care Hospitals Limited Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition and struck off the defendant's defense in a leave-and-license eviction suit. The court held that Family Care Hospitals' refusal to deposit Rs. 3,67,73,382 in arrears of license fees despite court orders—upheld through multiple appellate levels and by the Supreme Court—justified the drastic remedy of striking off defense under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. Key Reasoning: The court found that the Trial and Appellate Courts erred by citing pendency of revision proceedings and execution proceedings as reasons to reject the striking-off application. The court emphasized that once the deposit obligation attained finality (after Supreme Court dismissal on 18 October 2024), and the deadline of 30 September 2024 passed without compliance, the plaintiff acquired a right to striking off. Given the suit's seven-year pendency and the Supreme Court's direction to expedite hearing, relegating the matter back to the Trial Court would cause further delays contrary to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts