AJIT ATMARAM APRAJ vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/3008/2019
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th August 2021.
CNR: HCBM010476072019
Next Hearing
07th January 2020
Filing Number
BA/3008/2019
Filing Date
18-10-2019
Registration No
BA/3008/2019
Registration Date
24-10-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
12th August 2021
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AJIT ATMARAM APRAJ
Adv. pradnya udhav raibole
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
NITIN PUNJALAL DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK
FOR CIRCULATION - BAIL APPLICATION
AT 3.00 P.M.
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-01-2020 | FOR CIRCULATION - BAIL APPLICATION |
| 12-08-2021 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 02-08-2021 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 23-07-2021 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-07-2021 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted a six-month extension for deciding Sessions Case No.100633 of 2015, in the interest of justice, despite the trial court having already received four previous extensions. However, the court made clear that no further extensions would be permitted on any grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted a six-month extension for deciding Sessions Case No.100633 of 2015, in the interest of justice, despite the trial court having already received four previous extensions. However, the court made clear that no further extensions would be permitted on any grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts