PRABHAKAR VASUDEO MUKADAM AND ORS ROHIT D JOSHI vs LAXMAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL AND ORS — WP/2049/2023
Case under B.t. & A.l. Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010472892019
Filing Number
WP/28190/2019
Filing Date
22-10-2019
Registration No
WP/2049/2023
Registration Date
17-02-2023
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRABHAKAR VASUDEO MUKADAM AND ORS ROHIT D JOSHI
MR. UDAY VASUDEO MUKADAM
MR. SUHAS VASUDEO MUKADAM
Respondent(s)
LAXMAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL AND ORS
SMT. GANGUBAI SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SAU. KANTABAI YASHWANT PATIL
SAU. SARITA ATMARAM THALE
SMT. URMILA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SAU. UJWALA DHANANJAY PATIL
SHRI. GAJANAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SHRI. ADINATH SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SHRI. SUBHASH SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SHRI. MAHENDRA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SHRI. RAMKRISHNA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL
SHRI. VITHAL GAJANAN CHHATRE
SHRI. BHARAT GOVIND KHER
SHRI. ARVIND SHANKAR KHER
SAU. VIJAYA MAHADEO ATHAVALE
SAU. SHEELA VASANT MADORKAR
SAU. USHA VAIBHAV KULKARNI
SAU. BEENA CHANDRAKANT NIMKAR
SAU. MADHURI MOHAN MALEKAR
SHRI. DILIP MAHADEV ATHAVALE
SHRI. GURUNATH MADHAV KHER
SAU. RADHIKA KARLTON PAREIRA
SAU. RUPALI RATISH BALAN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
NOTIFICATION
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-11-2019 | NOTIFICATION |
| 03-02-2023 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 14-11-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 27-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying main appeal had already been decided by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal during the pendency of the petition, thereby rendering the writ petition moot and without purpose for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying main appeal had already been decided by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal during the pendency of the petition, thereby rendering the writ petition moot and without purpose for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts