PRABHAKAR VASUDEO MUKADAM AND ORS ROHIT D JOSHI vs LAXMAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL AND ORS — WP/2049/2023

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010472892019

Filing Number

WP/28190/2019

Filing Date

22-Oct-2019

Registration No

WP/2049/2023

Registration Date

17-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAKAR VASUDEO MUKADAM AND ORS ROHIT D JOSHI

  2. 2.MR. UDAY VASUDEO MUKADAM

  3. 3.MR. SUHAS VASUDEO MUKADAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL AND ORS

  2. 2.SMT. GANGUBAI SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  3. 3.SAU. KANTABAI YASHWANT PATIL

  4. 4.SAU. SARITA ATMARAM THALE

  5. 5.SMT. URMILA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  6. 6.SAU. UJWALA DHANANJAY PATIL

  7. 7.SHRI. GAJANAN SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  8. 8.SHRI. ADINATH SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  9. 9.SHRI. SUBHASH SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  10. 10.SHRI. MAHENDRA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  11. 11.SHRI. RAMKRISHNA SHYAMSUNDAR PATIL

  12. 12.SHRI. VITHAL GAJANAN CHHATRE

  13. 13.SHRI. BHARAT GOVIND KHER

  14. 14.SHRI. ARVIND SHANKAR KHER

  15. 15.SAU. VIJAYA MAHADEO ATHAVALE

  16. 16.SAU. SHEELA VASANT MADORKAR

  17. 17.SAU. USHA VAIBHAV KULKARNI

  18. 18.SAU. BEENA CHANDRAKANT NIMKAR

  19. 19.SAU. MADHURI MOHAN MALEKAR

  20. 20.SHRI. DILIP MAHADEV ATHAVALE

  21. 21.SHRI. GURUNATH MADHAV KHER

  22. 22.SAU. RADHIKA KARLTON PAREIRA

  23. 23.SAU. RUPALI RATISH BALAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying main appeal had already been decided by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal during the pendency of the petition, thereby rendering the writ petition moot and without purpose for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  12. 14-Nov-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  13. 03-Feb-2023

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)

  14. 20-Jan-2023

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  15. 04-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 22-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2049/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying main appeal had already been decided by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal during the pendency of the petition, thereby rendering the writ petition moot and without purpose for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case