DRISHTI HOSPITALITY CO. PVT.LTD. AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PLEADER APPELLATE SIDE AND ORS. — WP/15019/2023

Case under Bombay Public Trust Act 1960 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010471102023

Filing Number

WP/27993/2023

Filing Date

11-Oct-2023

Registration No

WP/15019/2023

Registration Date

02-Dec-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

25-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Public Trust Act 1960 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DRISHTI HOSPITALITY CO. PVT.LTD. AND ANR

    Adv. KASHMIRA SANGHVI

  2. 2.AMAL MAJMUDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PLEADER APPELLATE SIDE AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER, MUMBAI

    Adv. GP WRIT CELL

  3. 3.UNITOUCH CREATION LLP, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP, MUMBAI

    Adv. Jain Law Partners LLP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court rejected Respondent No. 3's oral application seeking extension of time to conclude proceedings before the Charity Commissioner, finding that the amendment application was deliberately filed one day before the court-imposed deadline of April 10, 2026, indicating intent to delay proceedings. The court upheld the Charity Commissioner's decision to decline consideration of the amendment application and ruled that no extension could be granted in the disposed writ petition without a formal interim application, though Respondent No. 3 remains free to pursue separate proceedings to challenge the non-consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  15. 01-Jul-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  16. 23-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  17. 23-Apr-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  18. 13-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  19. 13-Mar-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  20. 13-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  21. 13-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 11-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15019/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court rejected Respondent No. 3's oral application seeking extension of time to conclude proceedings before the Charity Commissioner, finding that the amendment application was deliberately filed one day before the court-imposed deadline of April 10, 2026, indicating intent to delay proceedings. The court upheld the Charity Commissioner's decision to decline consideration of the amendment application and ruled that no extension could be granted in the disposed writ petition without a formal interim application, though Respondent No. 3 remains free to pursue separate proceedings to challenge the non-consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case