MOHAMMAD UVESH JAVED SAMIM KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/3456/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010468432025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/17727/2025

Filing Date

02-09-2025

Registration No

BA/3456/2025

Registration Date

02-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 307, 398, 120B, 34
Arms Act Section 3, 25, 27
Bombay Police Act Section 37(1)(3), 135

Petitioner(s)

MOHAMMAD UVESH JAVED SAMIM KHAN

Adv. Dilip Shinde

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

10-09-2025

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

06-04-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

02-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

27-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Summary of BA/3456/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Mohammad Uvesh Javed Samim Khan, accused of armed robbery and attempt to murder under IPC §307, 398, 120B, 34 and Arms Act violations. The court found merit in the applicant's contention that no charges have been framed despite over three years and nine months of incarceration since June 2022, making trial completion unlikely within a reasonable period. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, subject to monthly police station attendance and mandatory trial court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of BA/3456/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Mohammad Uvesh Javed Samim Khan, accused of armed robbery and attempt to murder under IPC §307, 398, 120B, 34 and Arms Act violations. The court found merit in the applicant's contention that no charges have been framed despite over three years and nine months of incarceration since June 2022, making trial completion unlikely within a reasonable period. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, subject to monthly police station attendance and mandatory trial court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case