THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS vs GOPALA BAPU NIRGUDE 1. — IA/13615/2025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Next hearing: 05th December 2025.
CNR: HCBM010463612025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
IA/29345/2025
Filing Date
26-Aug-2025
Registration No
IA/13615/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS
-
2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. Vishwas Jakhere
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOPALA BAPU NIRGUDE 1.
-
2.TRIMBAK GOPALA NIRGUDE1.
-
3.SHANKAR GOPALA NIRGUDE1.
-
4.BABURAO GOPALA NIRGUDE1.
-
5.MANJULABAI GOPALA NIRGUDE1.
-
6.LAXMIBAI SAMPAT DAVANGE
-
7.KHANDU BAPU NIRGUDE
Case History
-
05-Dec-2025
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Case Summary: IA 13615/2025 The High Court of Bombay disposed of the State of Maharashtra's land acquisition appeal as withdrawn. The SLAO had awarded compensation of Rs.42,913/-, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.1,10,236/- (just marginally above the four-times parameter). Following State Government Resolutions, the court found the marginal difference insufficient to warrant continued litigation and allowed withdrawal. Court fees to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/13615/2025
Case Summary: IA 13615/2025 The High Court of Bombay disposed of the State of Maharashtra's land acquisition appeal as withdrawn. The SLAO had awarded compensation of Rs.42,913/-, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.1,10,236/- (just marginally above the four-times parameter). Following State Government Resolutions, the court found the marginal difference insufficient to warrant continued litigation and allowed withdrawal. Court fees to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts