MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar vs MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS — WP/10522/2011
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010463562011
Next Hearing
09th December 2011
Filing Number
WP/31942/2011
Filing Date
02-12-2011
Registration No
WP/10522/2011
Registration Date
03-12-2011
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
LEAVE AND LICENCE ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar
Respondent(s)
MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS
Adv. R.NO. 1 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
FOR PRODUCTION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR ADMISSION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-12-2011 | FOR PRODUCTION |
| 10-12-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 29-09-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 27-06-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 25-04-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts