MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar vs MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS — WP/10522/2011
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010463562011
Filing Number
WP/31942/2011
Filing Date
02-Dec-2011
Registration No
WP/10522/2011
Registration Date
03-Dec-2011
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
LEAVE AND LICENCE ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS
Adv. R.NO. 1 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
08-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
10-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
27-Jun-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
25-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
28-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
13-Feb-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
17-Jan-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
18-Dec-2024
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
- 13-Dec-2024
- 29-Nov-2024
-
11-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
11-Mar-2024
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
30-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
30-Jan-2024
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
04-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
04-Jan-2024
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
05-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
05-Dec-2023
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
20-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
13-Oct-2023
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
07-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
03-Jul-2023
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
03-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
21-Nov-2022
—
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
21-Nov-2022
—
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
16-Jan-2012
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.Y. GanooView PDF
-
21-Dec-2011
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Borde
-
09-Dec-2011
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. BordeView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2011
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10522/2011
Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts