MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar vs MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS — WP/10522/2011

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Dec-2011

CNR: HCBM010463562011

Filing Number

WP/31942/2011

Filing Date

02-Dec-2011

Registration No

WP/10522/2011

Registration Date

03-Dec-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

LEAVE AND LICENCE ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. CLIFFORD ANTHONY FALCON, THROUGH PRASHANT BHAGWAN SAUDAGAR P. S. DANI, ,Nachiket Khaladkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. P. S. PILLAI AND ORS

    Adv. R.NO. 1 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  8. 27-Jun-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  9. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  10. 25-Apr-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  11. 28-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  12. 13-Feb-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  13. 17-Jan-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  14. 18-Dec-2024

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  15. 13-Dec-2024
  16. 29-Nov-2024
  17. 11-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  18. 11-Mar-2024

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  19. 30-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  20. 30-Jan-2024

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  21. 04-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  22. 04-Jan-2024

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  23. 05-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  24. 05-Dec-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  25. 20-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  26. 13-Oct-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai

  27. 07-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  28. 03-Jul-2023

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  29. 03-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  30. 21-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai

  31. 21-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai

  32. 16-Jan-2012

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.Y. GanooView PDF

  33. 21-Dec-2011

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Borde

  34. 09-Dec-2011

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. BordeView PDF

  35. 09-Dec-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 02-Dec-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10522/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and quashed the Additional Commissioner's revisional order, confirming the original eviction order against the respondents. The court held that the Additional Commissioner exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence and reaching a contrary conclusion on the existence of a valid leave-and-license agreement dated 18/03/1997, which the trial court had properly upheld based on secondary evidence, society records, and credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case