AKHILENDRA PRATAP SURESHSINGH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/3397/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010460212025

Filing Number

BA/17443/2025

Filing Date

22-Aug-2025

Registration No

BA/3397/2025

Registration Date

22-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109,125,3(5),336(2),337,61(2),238
Arms Act Section 3,5,25,25(6),25(7),(I),25(8),25(9)
Police Act (Maharashtra) Section 37(1)(A),135
Mah. Control of Organised Crime Act Section 3(1),(I),(II),3(2),3(3),3(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKHILENDRA PRATAP SURESHSINGH

    Adv. Ishan Paradkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.Shehzeen Zaiuddin Siddique

    Adv. Trivankumar Karnani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: BA 3397/2025 The Bombay High Court dismissed the bail application of Akhilendra Pratap Sureshsingh (Accused No. 23), charged with harboring assailants in the October 2024 murder of Baba Siddiqui in Bandra. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement through co-accused confessional statements (admissible under MCOCA Section 18), call records between the applicant and co-accused, and their joint arrest in Uttar Pradesh, establishing sufficient material linking him to the organized crime conspiracy. The court rejected arguments that mere village acquaintance and phone exchanges were innocent, noting the serious nature of the harboring charge (punishable up to life imprisonment) and a separate POCSO offense, finding no bail conditions under MCOCA Section 21(4) were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  9. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  10. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  11. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  12. 08-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  13. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  14. 30-Mar-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale

  15. 25-Mar-2026

    For Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale

  16. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF

  17. 19-Jan-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  20. 03-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 22-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/3397/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA 3397/2025 The Bombay High Court dismissed the bail application of Akhilendra Pratap Sureshsingh (Accused No. 23), charged with harboring assailants in the October 2024 murder of Baba Siddiqui in Bandra. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement through co-accused confessional statements (admissible under MCOCA Section 18), call records between the applicant and co-accused, and their joint arrest in Uttar Pradesh, establishing sufficient material linking him to the organized crime conspiracy. The court rejected arguments that mere village acquaintance and phone exchanges were innocent, noting the serious nature of the harboring charge (punishable up to life imprisonment) and a separate POCSO offense, finding no bail conditions under MCOCA Section 21(4) were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case