SULZER PUMPS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs SUMEET RAJARAM KADAM AND ORS Advocate - THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH — WP/12201/2025

Case under Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section na. Disposed: Contested--Partly Allowed on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010459262025

Filing Number

WP/29054/2025

Filing Date

22-Aug-2025

Registration No

WP/12201/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partly Allowed

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SULZER PUMPS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. ELIXIR LEGAL SERVICES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMEET RAJARAM KADAM AND ORS Advocate - THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  2. 2.KAILAS MOHAN GURAV

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  3. 3.ASHVDEEP HARI BHALERAO

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  4. 4.GANESH DASHRATH DOHALE

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  5. 5.NARESH PADMAKAR RASAL

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  6. 6.SOPAN RAJARAM CHAUDHARI

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  7. 7.MAHESHWAR DINKAR KOCHAREKAR

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  8. 8.NITIN VILAS WAIDHANDE

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  9. 9.VINOD SUBHASH KURADE

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  10. 10.SANKET MAHENDRA GADE

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  11. 11.VAIBHAV MANOHAR GURAV

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  12. 12.SUNIL SHANKAR GHANEKAR

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  13. 13.UPPAL GURULAL

  14. 14.AMIT KUMAR SIROHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay partly allowed writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court order that found Sulzer Pumps India engaged in unfair labor practices. The court upheld the permanency granted to six workers (Complainant Nos. 7-12) based on evidence of continuous service despite casual designation, but quashed relief for six terminated workers (Complainant Nos. 1-6) as termination disputes fall outside the Industrial Court's jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  19. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  20. 04-Nov-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  21. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  22. 06-Oct-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  23. 29-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  24. 29-Sep-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  25. 15-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 22-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12201/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay partly allowed writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court order that found Sulzer Pumps India engaged in unfair labor practices. The court upheld the permanency granted to six workers (Complainant Nos. 7-12) based on evidence of continuous service despite casual designation, but quashed relief for six terminated workers (Complainant Nos. 1-6) as termination disputes fall outside the Industrial Court's jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case