Ms S P Developers vs The competent Office and District Deputy Registrar — IA/11174/2025
Case under Mah. Ownership Flat Transfer Act 1963 Section 11(3). Disposed: --Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010442392025
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
IA/28009/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
IA/11174/2025
Registration Date
14-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ms S P Developers
Adv. Steenson
Respondent(s)
-
1.The competent Office and District Deputy Registrar
-
2.Janak P Kalsara
-
3.The State of Maharashtra
-
4.Premji Nagar Coop Hsg Soc Ltd
-
5.Ambalal Madhavlal Patel
-
6.Rachhoddas Kalidas Patel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a deemed conveyance order under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, finding that disputes involving allegations of document forgery and excess area grant involve factual questions beyond writ jurisdiction. The court relegated the petitioner to civil court remedy, holding that the Competent Authority exercises limited jurisdiction for statutory compliance only and cannot adjudicate title/ownership disputes, and that civil court findings are not bound by the authority's determinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/11174/2025
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a deemed conveyance order under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, finding that disputes involving allegations of document forgery and excess area grant involve factual questions beyond writ jurisdiction. The court relegated the petitioner to civil court remedy, holding that the Competent Authority exercises limited jurisdiction for statutory compliance only and cannot adjudicate title/ownership disputes, and that civil court findings are not bound by the authority's determinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts