UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF POSTS AND ORS vs SUBHASH NATHA CHAVAN AND ORS — WP/3805/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010441172025
e-Filing Number
08-08-2025
Filing Number
WP/27945/2025
Filing Date
11-Aug-2025
Registration No
WP/3805/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Category
CAT related Service Matters ( 62 )
Sub-Category
Adverse Action ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF POSTS AND ORS
Adv. A R Gole
-
2.THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL MAHARASHTRA CIRCLE
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
3.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL NAGPUR REGION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
4.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL NEW MUMBAI REGION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
5.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL MUMBAI REGION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
6.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL GOA REGION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
7.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES BULDHANA DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
8.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES RAIGAD DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
9.THE SR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES THANE DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
10.THE SENIOR MANAGER MAIL MOTOR MANAGER
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
11.THE SR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE MUMBAI EAST DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
12.THE SR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE MUMBAI WEST DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
13.THE SR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES NASHIK DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
14.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RMS BM DIVISION MIRAJ
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
-
15.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RMS CENTRAL SORTING DIVISION
Adv. ASHUTOSH RAVINDRA GOLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASH NATHA CHAVAN AND ORS
-
2.GOVIND NARAYAN KALASKAR
-
3.MOTIRAM ANANDA DUTONDE
-
4.JIJABAI PRAHLAD WAGHMARE
-
5.BISMILLAH KHAN NOORULLAH KHAN
-
6.LAXMAN SADASHIV SATAO
-
7.BHIMRAO GABAJI SANAP
-
8.SHRIDHAR DAMODAR LAHANE
-
9.CHANDRAKANT RAMDAS PATIL
-
10.ASHOK LAXMAN SANAP
-
11.ASHA VISHNU PAWAR
-
12.SUNIL BHIKAJI NIGUDKAR
-
13.SUBHASH ATMARAM BAGWE
-
14.MAHADEV PANDURANG JADHAV
-
15.MAHADEO HARI BAND
-
16.RAMESH DEOCHAND KADU
-
17.BALKISAN MARUTI GHUGE
-
18.SHAKUNTALA RATNAKANT CHAVAN
-
19.BALKRISHNA VITTHAL JADHAV
-
20.DINESH DAJI TAWADE
-
21.MARUTI MURLIDHAR KORDE
-
22.TRAMBAK AMRUTA HADAKE
-
23.RAJENDRA RAMACHANDRA SHINDE
-
24.DILIPSINH RAJARAM SURYAWASHI
-
25.SUBHASH NARAYAN JADHAV
-
26.LAXMAN RAMA LOTE
-
27.ASHOK PANDHARINATH BORHADE
-
28.ASHOK RAMDAS PANPATIL
-
29.SNEHAL SITARAM GAWANDE
-
30.SUNITA SHIVAJIRAO MASKE
-
31.SHRADDHA PRAVIN SHAH
-
32.GOVIND SURYAKANT CHAVAN
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
Summary: Writ Petition No. 3805 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court between Union of India (Petitioner) and Subhash Natha Chavan (Respondent) was adjourned due to paucity of time. The case has been stood over to 11/06/2026, with any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continuing until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
12-Feb-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
28-Jan-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3805/2026
Summary: Writ Petition No. 3805 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court between Union of India (Petitioner) and Subhash Natha Chavan (Respondent) was adjourned due to paucity of time. The case has been stood over to 11/06/2026, with any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continuing until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts