PASCAL MICHEL POSTEL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/4385/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010436382025

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/16523/2025

Filing Date

07-08-2025

Registration No

WP/4385/2025

Registration Date

07-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

PASCAL MICHEL POSTEL

Adv. PARINAM LAW ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

SHAHIDA, D/O MOHAMMED ANSARI

Adv. Mubin Solkar

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

26-08-2025

-ADMISSION

17-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

30-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

18-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

24-03-2026

AT 4.00 P.M.

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Case Summary: WP/4385/2025 In Criminal Writ Petition No. 4385 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, petitioner Pascal Michel Postel sought relief against the State of Maharashtra and respondent Shahida. On 8 May 2026, all parties jointly requested an adjournment. The court granted the adjournment and ordered the matter to be listed for hearing on 17 June 2026, to be considered as part-heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4385/2025 In Criminal Writ Petition No. 4385 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, petitioner Pascal Michel Postel sought relief against the State of Maharashtra and respondent Shahida. On 8 May 2026, all parties jointly requested an adjournment. The court granted the adjournment and ordered the matter to be listed for hearing on 17 June 2026, to be considered as part-heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case