RAMDHANI @ PANCHAM CHHANGUR GUPTA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/3207/2025
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010432862025
Filing Number
BA/16358/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
BA/3207/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMDHANI @ PANCHAM CHHANGUR GUPTA
Adv. J S Tiwari
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR CIRCULATION
Revoked
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-08-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 11-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 13-02-2026 | Revoked |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/3207/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ramdhani @ Pancham Chhangur Gupta, accused of murder under IPC Section 302, based on excessive pre-trial incarceration. The applicant had been jailed since March 19, 2019, and despite charges being framed on November 18, 2025, no witness summons had been issued for any of the 49 prosecution witnesses, indicating the trial would not conclude in reasonable time. The court found no evidence of delay caused by the applicant and ruled that prolonged imprisonment without trial progress warranted bail on a PR Bond of Rs. 30,000 with sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/3207/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ramdhani @ Pancham Chhangur Gupta, accused of murder under IPC Section 302, based on excessive pre-trial incarceration. The applicant had been jailed since March 19, 2019, and despite charges being framed on November 18, 2025, no witness summons had been issued for any of the 49 prosecution witnesses, indicating the trial would not conclude in reasonable time. The court found no evidence of delay caused by the applicant and ruled that prolonged imprisonment without trial progress warranted bail on a PR Bond of Rs. 30,000 with sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts