RAVINDER KAUR GILL AND ORS vs JEET KAUR MUKTIYAR SINGH MANN AND ANR — IA/2794/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010432832024

e-Filing Number

28-08-2024

Filing Number

IA/24892/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

IA/2794/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER KAUR GILL AND ORS

    Adv. AVHAD AVINASH BHASKARRAO

  2. 2.DEVINDER KAUR GILL

  3. 3.TAJINDER SINGH GILL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JEET KAUR MUKTIYAR SINGH MANN AND ANR

  2. 2.KARTARSING KUDASINGH MANN SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir)2.

  3. 3.HARBANS KAUR JOGRAI SINGH2.

  4. 4.KARMJEET KAUR JOGRAI SINGH2.

  5. 5.RANJEE KAUR NACCHTAR SINGH2.

  6. 6.MALKIT KAUR JAGROOP SINGH2.

  7. 7.SUKHEET KAUR MALKIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding the trial and first appellate court's decree granting specific performance of a 1985 sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract was adequately established through admitted contract terms, consideration payments, and public notice of her rights, and rejected the appellant's argument that courts failed to record specific findings on this issue. The court determined that the first appellate court's factual findings on readiness and willingness could not be interfered with in second appeal jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  4. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2794/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding the trial and first appellate court's decree granting specific performance of a 1985 sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract was adequately established through admitted contract terms, consideration payments, and public notice of her rights, and rejected the appellant's argument that courts failed to record specific findings on this issue. The court determined that the first appellate court's factual findings on readiness and willingness could not be interfered with in second appeal jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case