FRANCIS DANIEL GAIKWAD AND ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. — APL/1078/2022
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010432242022
Filing Number
APL/17594/2022
Filing Date
12-Oct-2022
Registration No
APL/1078/2022
Registration Date
16-Nov-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FRANCIS DANIEL GAIKWAD AND ORS.
Adv. Prachi Tatake,PRASANNA KISHOR SHAHANE,PRASANNA KISHOR SHAHANE, SACHIN B CHANDAN (APPOINTED ADV THROUGH LEGAL AID DT 18.03.
-
2.,PRASANNA KISHOR SHAHANE
-
3.JYOSTNA DANIEL GAIKWAD
Adv. PRASANNA KISHOR SHAHANE
-
4.MONIKA W/O NEEL KHAJEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
-
2.MONIKA W/O FARNICIS GAIKWAD
Adv. SAKSHEE P CHAVAN (APPOINTED ADV)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Nov-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 0203 of 2022 under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife) after the husband and wife amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and both filed for mutual consent divorce before the Family Court. The court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 each on the applicants and the respondent (wife), relying on Supreme Court precedents that permit quashing of FIRs in settled domestic cases where no useful purpose is served by continuing criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
Revoked
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
11-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
12-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
08-Jan-2024
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
02-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
02-Nov-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
05-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
05-Oct-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
21-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
24-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
03-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
03-Aug-2023
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
27-Jul-2023
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
20-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
15-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
13-Mar-2023
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan
-
16-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF
-
16-Jan-2023
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan
-
05-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF
-
05-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. APL/1078/2022
The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 0203 of 2022 under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife) after the husband and wife amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and both filed for mutual consent divorce before the Family Court. The court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 each on the applicants and the respondent (wife), relying on Supreme Court precedents that permit quashing of FIRs in settled domestic cases where no useful purpose is served by continuing criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts