Sachin Bajla vs Honest Shelters Private Limited and ors — IA/12197/2024

Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 57. Disposed: --Allowed on 07th January 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010426792024

e-Filing Number

26-08-2024

Filing Number

IA/24557/2024

Filing Date

26-Aug-2024

Registration No

IA/12197/2024

Registration Date

28-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-Jan-2025

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 57

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Bajla

    Adv. Vesta Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Honest Shelters Private Limited and ors

  2. 2.Sunil Girdharilal Mittal

  3. 3.Avi Aggarwal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted a Second Appeal challenging a RERA Appellate Tribunal order that conditioned interim relief on the appellant depositing ₹38.18 crores (50% of total consideration). The court confirmed interim relief restraining the developer from selling the disputed flat, holding that the deposit condition was unjustifiable as it exceeded statutory limits under RERA (10%) and MOFA (20%), especially given the developer's 12-year unexplained delay since the 2010 allotment and the appellant's payment of ₹5.51 crores. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jan-2025

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  4. 07-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 19-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  6. 19-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  8. 26-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/12197/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted a Second Appeal challenging a RERA Appellate Tribunal order that conditioned interim relief on the appellant depositing ₹38.18 crores (50% of total consideration). The court confirmed interim relief restraining the developer from selling the disputed flat, holding that the deposit condition was unjustifiable as it exceeded statutory limits under RERA (10%) and MOFA (20%), especially given the developer's 12-year unexplained delay since the 2010 allotment and the appellant's payment of ₹5.51 crores. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case