WILFRED LOBO AND ORS vs A.A. ESTATES PRIVATE LTD., AND ORS Advocate - Dipashri Udaybhanu Raorane — IA/3775/2021

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159. Next hearing: 21st September 2022.

Next hearing 21-Sep-2022

CNR: HCBM010424102021

Filing Number

IA/23642/2021

Filing Date

03-Dec-2021

Registration No

IA/3775/2021

Registration Date

03-Dec-2021

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WILFRED LOBO AND ORS

    Adv. PRASHANT GANESHNARAYAN PANDEY

  2. 2.INDERJIT SINGH

  3. 3.YANUSH AUGUSTINE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.A. ESTATES PRIVATE LTD., AND ORS Advocate - Dipashri Udaybhanu Raorane

  2. 2.ANIL AGARWAL, MANAGING DIRECTOR

  3. 3.ANAND GUPTA, MANAGING DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. 21-Sep-2022

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Summary of IA/3775/2021 The Bombay High Court (May 7, 2026) disposed of the interim application filed by Wilfred Lobo and others in consolidated contempt petitions against A.A. Estates Private Ltd. The parties reached agreement on the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (PAAA) terms, with the respondent submitting the final sanctioned plan via Occupation Certificate. The court granted petitioners liberty to inspect documents from the Registry and ordered registration of the PAAA within four weeks, with case stand-over to June 9, 2026 to ascertain compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Sep-2022

    For Orders-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. Bhadang

  4. 03-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3775/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of IA/3775/2021 The Bombay High Court (May 7, 2026) disposed of the interim application filed by Wilfred Lobo and others in consolidated contempt petitions against A.A. Estates Private Ltd. The parties reached agreement on the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (PAAA) terms, with the respondent submitting the final sanctioned plan via Occupation Certificate. The court granted petitioners liberty to inspect documents from the Registry and ordered registration of the PAAA within four weeks, with case stand-over to June 9, 2026 to ascertain compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case