MAHINDRA CIE AUTOMOTIVE LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU GP HIGH COURT AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, RESP NO. 1 TO 6 — WP/10482/2018

Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010421702018

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

Filing Number

WP/26496/2018

Filing Date

12-09-2018

Registration No

WP/10482/2018

Registration Date

14-09-2018

Judge

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Coram

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPANY LAW, MRTP AND ALLIED ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Stamps Act, 1958

Petitioner(s)

MAHINDRA CIE AUTOMOTIVE LTD.

Adv. Khaitan and Co

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU GP HIGH COURT AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, RESP NO. 1 TO 6

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

14-09-2018

FOR PRODUCTION

01-07-2026

FOR ADMISSION

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

04-11-2020

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Case Summary: WP/10482/2018 - Mahindra CIE Automotive Ltd v. State of Maharashtra The writ petition raised arguable points and was admitted ("Rule"). The court made the rule on interim relief (prayer clauses b and c) returnable on 1st July 2026. Ad-interim protection granted since September 14, 2018 shall continue, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking that if the petition is dismissed, it will comply with the impugned order. The respondent-State waived notice and was granted time to file a reply before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/10482/2018 - Mahindra CIE Automotive Ltd v. State of Maharashtra The writ petition raised arguable points and was admitted ("Rule"). The court made the rule on interim relief (prayer clauses b and c) returnable on 1st July 2026. Ad-interim protection granted since September 14, 2018 shall continue, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking that if the petition is dismissed, it will comply with the impugned order. The respondent-State waived notice and was granted time to file a reply before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case