SMT. ANJALI KRISHNA BORIDKAR (SINCE DECD.) THROUGH LRS.(Legal Heir) vs M/S. VEEKAYLAL INVESTMENT CO. LTD. AND ORS. Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R. NO. 10,rajeev r sharma,FOR R.NO. 1 ( C & VP FILED) — WP/12022/2017
Case under B.t. & A.l. Act. Disposed: --Disposed off as Withdrawn on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010420732017
Filing Number
WP/27474/2017
Filing Date
26-Sep-2017
Registration No
WP/12022/2017
Registration Date
03-Nov-2017
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed off as Withdrawn
Last updated 03-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. ANJALI KRISHNA BORIDKAR (SINCE DECD.) THROUGH LRS.(Legal Heir)
Adv. Pankaj Pandey 1.
-
2.SMT. MADHURI MADHUKAR ANJALEKAR1.
-
3.SMT. JAYASHRI KRISHNA BORIDKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. VEEKAYLAL INVESTMENT CO. LTD. AND ORS. Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R. NO. 10,rajeev r sharma,FOR R.NO. 1 ( C & VP FILED)
-
2.SMT. MALATI MADAN BORIDKAR
Adv. Aishwarya Shinde
-
3.SHRI. SAMADHAN MADAN BORIDKAR
Adv. Aishwarya Shinde
-
4.SMT. MEERA JAYENDRA BORIDKAR
Adv. Aishwarya Shinde
-
5.SHRI. DILIP DATTATRAYA BORIDKAR
Adv. Aishwarya Shinde
-
6.SHRI. NARAYAN DATTATRAYA BORIDKAR
-
7.SMT. MADHAVI SANJAY PALWANKAR
-
8.SMT. DEEPA RAJESH UKROLKAR
-
9.SHRI. HAJI ALI MOHAMED (DECD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir)9.
-
10.SMT. ZULEKHABAI HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
11.SMT. AMUBAI HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
12.SHRI. SALIM DAWOOD HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
13.SHRI. YASIM DAWOOD HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
14.SHRI. SHABBIR DAWOOD HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
15.SHRI. SUBER DAWOOD HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
16.SHRI. BADRESHMA SULEMAN HAJI ALI MOHD. KASAM9.
-
17.SHRI. MOHAMED SIDDIQUI PATKA9.
-
18.SHRI. FIROZ PATKA
-
19.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of two consolidated writ petitions on April 17, 2026. In WP 6437/2018, the petitioners' counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition, which was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. In WP 12022/2017, as no one appeared for the petitioners, the petition was dismissed in default, with all pending applications in both petitions declared infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
For Dismissal
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
28-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
13-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2020
For Orders (Office Objections)
Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. Bhadang
-
13-Dec-2019
Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF
-
13-Dec-2019
For Orders (Office Objections)
Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)
-
08-Nov-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ujjal BhuyanView PDF
-
08-Nov-2019
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
08-Mar-2019
Due For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya
-
20-Feb-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. AchliyaView PDF
-
20-Feb-2019
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya
-
29-Jan-2019
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
12-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/12022/2017
The Bombay High Court disposed of two consolidated writ petitions on April 17, 2026. In WP 6437/2018, the petitioners' counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition, which was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. In WP 12022/2017, as no one appeared for the petitioners, the petition was dismissed in default, with all pending applications in both petitions declared infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts