MANASI MILIND JOSHI AND ANR. vs M/S. DAMODAR PROPERTIES AND ORS. Advocate - Vrushali L Maindad, (RESP. NO. — WP/4070/2014

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010419532014

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/4070/2014

Filing Date

13-10-2014

Registration No

WP/4070/2014

Registration Date

27-10-2014

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Constitution of India Section 227
Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section 4(1)(1A),13
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 406,420,34

Petitioner(s)

MANASI MILIND JOSHI AND ANR.

Adv. Vaibhav P Patankar

MILIND MADHUKAR JOSHI

Respondent(s)

M/S. DAMODAR PROPERTIES AND ORS. Advocate - Vrushali L Maindad, (RESP. NO.

,(RESP. NO.

,Sudhir Sadavarte

DEPAK SHASHIKANT PATWARDHAN

MUKUND BHIKOBA BORKAR

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE

01-04-2015

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS]

05-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION /HEARING

23-04-2026

FOR HEARING

05-03-2026

FOR HEARING

23-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE

Case Summary: WP/4070/2014 The High Court of Bombay admitted both the criminal writ petition and revision application for hearing ("Rule in both matters"). The case involves criminal charges under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and IPC sections 406 and 420 following discharge of the accused. The court noted previous mediation attempts failed to achieve settlement. Importantly, the court clarified that pendency of these petitions shall not constitute a stay on trial court proceedings or grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4070/2014 The High Court of Bombay admitted both the criminal writ petition and revision application for hearing ("Rule in both matters"). The case involves criminal charges under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and IPC sections 406 and 420 following discharge of the accused. The court noted previous mediation attempts failed to achieve settlement. Importantly, the court clarified that pendency of these petitions shall not constitute a stay on trial court proceedings or grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case