BASANTIDEVI MAHESHKUMAR SHARMA AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/4218/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 21st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010417482025
Filing Number
WP/15777/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
WP/4218/2025
Registration Date
31-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Orders Passed under D.V. Act ( 109 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BASANTIDEVI MAHESHKUMAR SHARMA AND ANR
Adv. Ashok M Saraogi
MAHESHKUMAR S/O CHOTTURAM SHARMA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
NIRMALA (NIRU) W/O SUBHASH SHARMA
Adv. JAISWAL MANOJ PHOOLCHAND
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR CIRCULATION
AT 3.00 P.M.
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-08-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 21-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 18-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 20-01-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 19-01-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the maintenance order of Rs. 80,000 per month granted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under the Domestic Violence Act, as the petitioners had withdrawn their challenge to the Family Court's earlier maintenance order of Rs. 70,000 per month, making the lower court's reasoning untenable. The court remitted the maintenance application back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for fresh decision on merits within nine months, while keeping the restraint on dispossessing the respondent from the disputed flat intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the maintenance order of Rs. 80,000 per month granted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under the Domestic Violence Act, as the petitioners had withdrawn their challenge to the Family Court's earlier maintenance order of Rs. 70,000 per month, making the lower court's reasoning untenable. The court remitted the maintenance application back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for fresh decision on merits within nine months, while keeping the restraint on dispossessing the respondent from the disputed flat intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts