Axis Bank Limited PUROHIT VIJAY vs Rahul Gupta Advocate - VIPUL — WP/11623/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 13th November 2025.
CNR: HCBM010417122025
e-Filing Number
30-07-2025
Filing Number
WP/26480/2025
Filing Date
31-Jul-2025
Registration No
WP/11623/2025
Registration Date
03-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
13-Nov-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Axis Bank Limited PUROHIT VIJAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rahul Gupta Advocate - VIPUL
-
2.Girish Paranjpe
-
3.Gajanan Godbole
-
4.The Internal Committee AKA Central Internal Committee
-
5.Fact Finding Team (FFT)
-
6.T Shalini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Axis Bank Limited's writ petition, holding that since the appeal before the Industrial Court had already been disposed of, the bank's request for extension of time did not survive. The court found no merit in pursuing the extension plea after the underlying appeal had concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
01-Oct-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
29-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11623/2025
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Axis Bank Limited's writ petition, holding that since the appeal before the Industrial Court had already been disposed of, the bank's request for extension of time did not survive. The court found no merit in pursuing the extension plea after the underlying appeal had concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts