DR. S. ANANTH BHANDARY vs SMT. CHITRA BHANDARY Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,SWAPNIL P. KAMBLE — FCA/146/2019

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010412142018

Filing Number

FCA/25906/2018

Filing Date

06-Sep-2018

Registration No

FCA/146/2019

Registration Date

23-Aug-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. S. ANANTH BHANDARY

    Adv. ANB Legal,Zerick Dastur ,Zerick Dastur , ,Zerick Dastur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. CHITRA BHANDARY Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,SWAPNIL P. KAMBLE

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: FCA/146/2019 — Dr. S. Ananth Bhandary v. Smt. Chitra Bhandary The Bombay High Court allowed the appellant-husband's interim application to produce additional financial evidence (including tax returns, bank statements, GST filings, and property ownership documents) to challenge the wife's maintenance entitlement granted by the Family Court in 2018. The court permitted these documents on record within four weeks, with the wife granted four additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit contesting them. Meanwhile, the husband must clear five months of maintenance arrears and continue paying monthly maintenance until the appeal is finally decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2023

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye , Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  4. 06-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye,hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF

  5. 14-Dec-2022

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar

  6. 12-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh,hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF

  7. 12-Oct-2022

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar

  8. 07-Sep-2022

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh,hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF

  9. 07-Sep-2022

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  10. 27-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. VaraleView PDF

  11. 27-Jul-2022

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram

  12. 29-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav,hon'ble Shri Justice K.R. ShriramView PDF

  13. 14-Sep-2020

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  14. 20-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  15. 20-Feb-2020

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  16. 27-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  17. 27-Nov-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  18. 04-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF

  19. 04-Oct-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla

  20. 30-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF

  21. 30-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 06-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. FCA/146/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FCA/146/2019 — Dr. S. Ananth Bhandary v. Smt. Chitra Bhandary The Bombay High Court allowed the appellant-husband's interim application to produce additional financial evidence (including tax returns, bank statements, GST filings, and property ownership documents) to challenge the wife's maintenance entitlement granted by the Family Court in 2018. The court permitted these documents on record within four weeks, with the wife granted four additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit contesting them. Meanwhile, the husband must clear five months of maintenance arrears and continue paying monthly maintenance until the appeal is finally decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case