DR. S. ANANTH BHANDARY vs SMT. CHITRA BHANDARY Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,SWAPNIL P. KAMBLE — FCA/146/2019
Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010412142018
Filing Number
FCA/25906/2018
Filing Date
06-Sep-2018
Registration No
FCA/146/2019
Registration Date
23-Aug-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. S. ANANTH BHANDARY
Adv. ANB Legal,Zerick Dastur ,Zerick Dastur , ,Zerick Dastur
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. CHITRA BHANDARY Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,FOR RESP. NO. 1 ,SWAPNIL P. KAMBLE
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
Case Summary: FCA/146/2019 — Dr. S. Ananth Bhandary v. Smt. Chitra Bhandary The Bombay High Court allowed the appellant-husband's interim application to produce additional financial evidence (including tax returns, bank statements, GST filings, and property ownership documents) to challenge the wife's maintenance entitlement granted by the Family Court in 2018. The court permitted these documents on record within four weeks, with the wife granted four additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit contesting them. Meanwhile, the husband must clear five months of maintenance arrears and continue paying monthly maintenance until the appeal is finally decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2023
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye , Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka
-
06-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye,hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF
-
14-Dec-2022
For Direction
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
12-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh,hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF
-
12-Oct-2022
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
07-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh,hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF
-
07-Sep-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale
-
27-Jul-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. VaraleView PDF
-
27-Jul-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram
-
29-Jun-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav,hon'ble Shri Justice K.R. ShriramView PDF
-
14-Sep-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
20-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF
-
20-Feb-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
27-Nov-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF
-
27-Nov-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
04-Oct-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF
-
04-Oct-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla
-
30-Aug-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Akil Kureshi,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF
-
30-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. FCA/146/2019
Case Summary: FCA/146/2019 — Dr. S. Ananth Bhandary v. Smt. Chitra Bhandary The Bombay High Court allowed the appellant-husband's interim application to produce additional financial evidence (including tax returns, bank statements, GST filings, and property ownership documents) to challenge the wife's maintenance entitlement granted by the Family Court in 2018. The court permitted these documents on record within four weeks, with the wife granted four additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit contesting them. Meanwhile, the husband must clear five months of maintenance arrears and continue paying monthly maintenance until the appeal is finally decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts