MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER vs DYNANDEO CHINDU UBHE AND ORS. Advocate - P H Potnis — HCBM10408372025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010408372025
Filing Number
FA/25909/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. NITIN GAWARE PATIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DYNANDEO CHINDU UBHE AND ORS. Advocate - P H Potnis
-
2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO.6,
-
3.THE COLLECTOR
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
-For Order- First Appeal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjourned all consolidated First Appeals and Interim Applications filed by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation versus Balkrishna Hari Ubhe and others to April 1, 2026. The case was stood over without any substantive order on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
12-Nov-2025
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
07-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjourned all consolidated First Appeals and Interim Applications filed by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation versus Balkrishna Hari Ubhe and others to April 1, 2026. The case was stood over without any substantive order on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts