JAI SAI PUSHPA CHS LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS. — CRR/24/2025

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010403632025

Filing Number

CRR/25618/2025

Filing Date

24-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRR/24/2025

Registration Date

24-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI SAI PUSHPA CHS LTD.

    Adv. Abhijit Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition after the Court Receiver successfully took physical possession of the property and handed it over to petitioner Jai Sai Pushpa CHS Ltd., with all court directions dated 24/06/2025 being complied with. The Court Receiver was discharged without passing accounts, and the petitioner was ordered to pay the report costs within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  4. 24-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/24/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition after the Court Receiver successfully took physical possession of the property and handed it over to petitioner Jai Sai Pushpa CHS Ltd., with all court directions dated 24/06/2025 being complied with. The Court Receiver was discharged without passing accounts, and the petitioner was ordered to pay the report costs within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case