NILESH ALIAS NICKY HARSHLAL DINGRA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/4044/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227, 14, 21. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010397752025
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/15035/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
WP/4044/2025
Registration Date
22-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Seeking Directions ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NILESH ALIAS NICKY HARSHLAL DINGRA
Adv. Raju Suryawanshi
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF POLICE
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-07-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-09-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 07-08-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4044/2025 The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed both the externment order (July 12, 2024) and the appellate order (January 30, 2025). The court found that the externment order under the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, lacked proper legal foundation: (1) substantial time gap weakened the link between old crimes and the externment measure; (2) confidential witness statements were unverified and general in nature, with no recorded subjective satisfaction that witnesses feared for safety; and (3) most critically, the authority failed to record reasons justifying the maximum two-year externment period, violating Supreme Court precedent requiring documented subjective satisfaction for such restrictions on fundamental rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4044/2025 The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed both the externment order (July 12, 2024) and the appellate order (January 30, 2025). The court found that the externment order under the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, lacked proper legal foundation: (1) substantial time gap weakened the link between old crimes and the externment measure; (2) confidential witness statements were unverified and general in nature, with no recorded subjective satisfaction that witnesses feared for safety; and (3) most critically, the authority failed to record reasons justifying the maximum two-year externment period, violating Supreme Court precedent requiring documented subjective satisfaction for such restrictions on fundamental rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts