SMT. ANUSAYA LAXMAN PHADAKE vs M/S. KRISHNA ENTERPRISES THR. ITS PARTNER SHAILESH RATIBHAI PATEL AND ORS. Advocate - Jeetenndra Sachddev, ,Pratik Sabrad — CP/430/2017
Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010397632017
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
CP/26010/2017
Filing Date
12-09-2017
Registration No
CP/430/2017
Registration Date
10-10-2017
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. ANUSAYA LAXMAN PHADAKE
Adv. jitendra Bakliwal
Respondent(s)
M/S. KRISHNA ENTERPRISES THR. ITS PARTNER SHAILESH RATIBHAI PATEL AND ORS. Advocate - Jeetenndra Sachddev, ,Pratik Sabrad
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
For Dismissal
FOR ADMISSION
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-09-2018 | For Dismissal |
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 29-04-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the contempt petition in the case of Anusaya Laxman Phadake v. M/S. Krishna Enterprises. Respondent No. 1 offered monetary compensation and expressed willingness to amicably resolve the dispute to purge the contempt, while the petitioner's counsel sought time to take instructions. The case has been listed for hearing on June 9, 2026, pending notice to remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the contempt petition in the case of Anusaya Laxman Phadake v. M/S. Krishna Enterprises. Respondent No. 1 offered monetary compensation and expressed willingness to amicably resolve the dispute to purge the contempt, while the petitioner's counsel sought time to take instructions. The case has been listed for hearing on June 9, 2026, pending notice to remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts