SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR. vs M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. Advocate - D R Mahadik, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2 — FA/1879/2013
Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010396642013
Next Hearing
12th December 1212
Filing Number
FA/26920/2013
Filing Date
03-09-2013
Registration No
FA/1879/2013
Registration Date
18-12-2013
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR.
Adv. TJMENDON
SMT. BHARATHI HANUMANTHAPPA GOWDA.
Respondent(s)
M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. Advocate - D R Mahadik, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2
NEW INDIA ASS. CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE (FIRST APPEALS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-01-2021 | APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 14-06-2023 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 03-05-2023 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
| 18-04-2016 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE (FIRST APPEALS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue on proving the parent-deceased relationship was raised, preventing the parents from testifying; in the interest of social welfare legislation, the Commissioner must now frame an express issue and allow the parents to present evidence of their relationship to the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue on proving the parent-deceased relationship was raised, preventing the parents from testifying; in the interest of social welfare legislation, the Commissioner must now frame an express issue and allow the parents to present evidence of their relationship to the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts