SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR. vs M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. Advocate - D R Mahadik, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2 — FA/1879/2013

Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Dec-1212

CNR: HCBM010396642013

Filing Number

FA/26920/2013

Filing Date

03-Sep-2013

Registration No

FA/1879/2013

Registration Date

18-Dec-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR.

    Adv. TJMENDON

  2. 2.SMT. BHARATHI HANUMANTHAPPA GOWDA.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. Advocate - D R Mahadik, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2

  2. 2.NEW INDIA ASS. CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue on proving the parent-deceased relationship was raised, preventing the parents from testifying; in the interest of social welfare legislation, the Commissioner must now frame an express issue and allow the parents to present evidence of their relationship to the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  5. 14-Jun-2023

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  6. 03-May-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF

  7. 03-May-2023

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  8. 30-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF

  9. 28-Jan-2021

    Appeals For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  10. 18-Apr-2016

    For Admission - After Notice (First Appeals)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice R.P. Sondurbaldota

  11. 11-Apr-2016

    Appeals For Admission - After Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice R.P. Sondurbaldota

  12. 24-Apr-2015

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF

  13. 24-Apr-2015

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  14. 27-Mar-2015

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF

  15. 27-Mar-2015

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  16. 26-Feb-2015

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF

  17. 26-Feb-2015

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  18. 15-Jan-2015

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF

  19. 15-Jan-2015

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  20. 24-Dec-2014

    —View PDF

  21. 24-Dec-2014

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  22. 26-Nov-2014

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF

  23. 26-Nov-2014

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  24. 01-Oct-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF

  25. 01-Oct-2014

    Appeals For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  26. 09-May-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 03-Sep-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/1879/2013

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue on proving the parent-deceased relationship was raised, preventing the parents from testifying; in the interest of social welfare legislation, the Commissioner must now frame an express issue and allow the parents to present evidence of their relationship to the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case