M/S MORWAL BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED DR M SHAH ALAM KHAN, ,Puja J. Acharekar vs GRAVITY SILK MILLS LIMITED — FA/998/2012

Case under Indian Contract Act 1872. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010392882011

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

29th June 2012

Filing Number

FA/26977/2011

Filing Date

05-10-2011

Registration No

FA/998/2012

Registration Date

22-06-2012

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Indian Contract Act 1872

Petitioner(s)

M/S MORWAL BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED DR M SHAH ALAM KHAN, ,Puja J. Acharekar

Respondent(s)

GRAVITY SILK MILLS LIMITED

Adv. BHARAT VAISHNAWA AND CO. FOR RESPONDENT 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

29-06-2012

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

24-01-2019

FOR ORDERS (OFFICE OBJECTIONS)[CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

03-10-2013

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

05-09-2013

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

11-07-2013

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

27-06-2014
12-12-2014
07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

The Bombay High Court disposed of two interconnected appeals (FA/998/2012 and FA/2375/2011) between M/s Morwal Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and Gravity Silk Mills Limited on May 7, 2026, after the parties reached a settlement. The court accepted the consent terms filed by both parties and treated the undertakings therein as court undertakings, resulting in disposal of both appeals and the related interim application in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of two interconnected appeals (FA/998/2012 and FA/2375/2011) between M/s Morwal Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and Gravity Silk Mills Limited on May 7, 2026, after the parties reached a settlement. The court accepted the consent terms filed by both parties and treated the undertakings therein as court undertakings, resulting in disposal of both appeals and the related interim application in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case