GULAB RAMCHANDRA SHINDE SHRI.VAIBHAV PATANKAR vs SANTOSH BANARSI CHAVAN AND ANR. — APEAL/1249/2008

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Nov-2008

CNR: HCBM010391332008

Filing Number

APEAL/1249/2008

Filing Date

29-Nov-2008

Registration No

APEAL/1249/2008

Registration Date

29-Nov-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )

Sub-Category

Against Acquittal - By Pvt Party (378 Cr.P.C./419 BNSS) ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB RAMCHANDRA SHINDE SHRI.VAIBHAV PATANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH BANARSI CHAVAN AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court transferred a criminal appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act from the High Court to the Sessions Court, holding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear such appeals by victims/complainants. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that victims have statutory rights to appeal acquittals under Section 372 CrPC and directed expeditious disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

  5. 29-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/1249/2008

  6. 12-Nov-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Nov-2008

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court transferred a criminal appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act from the High Court to the Sessions Court, holding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear such appeals by victims/complainants. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that victims have statutory rights to appeal acquittals under Section 372 CrPC and directed expeditious disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case