M/S LOTUS ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER vs UNION OF INDIA THR JOINT SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/7525/2021

Case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010390682021

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/21723/2021

Filing Date

06-11-2021

Registration No

WP/7525/2021

Registration Date

06-11-2021

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

M/S LOTUS ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER

Adv. Nirav Shroff

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA THR JOINT SECRETARY AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

08-11-2021

FOR CIRCULATION

08-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S Lotus Enterprises after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal, stating that the designated court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already discharged the petitioners under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code from charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the PML Act. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying criminal proceedings had been resolved in favor of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S Lotus Enterprises after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal, stating that the designated court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already discharged the petitioners under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code from charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the PML Act. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying criminal proceedings had been resolved in favor of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case