M/S LOTUS ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER vs UNION OF INDIA THR JOINT SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/7525/2021
Case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010390682021
Filing Number
WP/21723/2021
Filing Date
06-Nov-2021
Registration No
WP/7525/2021
Registration Date
06-Nov-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S LOTUS ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER
Adv. Nirav Shroff
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THR JOINT SECRETARY AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S Lotus Enterprises after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal, stating that the designated court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already discharged the petitioners under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code from charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the PML Act. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying criminal proceedings had been resolved in favor of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
-
08-Nov-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF
-
08-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7525/2021
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S Lotus Enterprises after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal, stating that the designated court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already discharged the petitioners under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code from charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the PML Act. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying criminal proceedings had been resolved in favor of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts