MAGMA INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs KISHANBHAI AYTULBHAI HANDU VARLI @ PAGI (DELETED) AND ORS. — IA/10307/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010388742025

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

IA/24747/2025

Filing Date

18-07-2025

Registration No

IA/10307/2025

Registration Date

21-07-2025

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

MAGMA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Adv. KALPANA TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

KISHANBHAI AYTULBHAI HANDU VARLI @ PAGI (DELETED) AND ORS.

INDUBEN KISANBHAI PATEL HANDU VARLI @ PAGI

SHRADDHAKUMARI KISHANBHAI PATEL

LEGAL HEIR OF CLAIMANT KISHANBHAI AUTTULIBHAI HANDU VARLI @ PAGI-JAMINI KISHANBHAI PATEL

SURESHBHAI LAXMANBHAI GAROD.

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION.

Hearing History

Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

07-05-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

22-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

28-01-2026

FOR ORDERS (SPARE COPY/IES NOT SUPPLIED)

12-01-2026

FOR ORDERS (SPARE COPY/IES NOT SUPPLIED)

16-09-2025

INTERIM APPLICATION

Orders

23-04-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Case Summary: IA 10307/2025 In Interim Application No. 10307/2025 filed by Magma Insurance Co. Ltd. before the Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), the matter came up for hearing on 23/04/2026. No parties appeared before the court. The case was adjourned pending service of notice reports from respondent nos. 2 to 6, with a two-week adjournment granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 10307/2025 In Interim Application No. 10307/2025 filed by Magma Insurance Co. Ltd. before the Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), the matter came up for hearing on 23/04/2026. No parties appeared before the court. The case was adjourned pending service of notice reports from respondent nos. 2 to 6, with a two-week adjournment granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case