SMT. KASHI RAM BORKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER AND ORS. Advocate - JAGDISH ARADWAD REDDY, RESP NO.6,NO. 3, 4,Deepak R More — WP/11966/2018
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Disposed: Contested--Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010388282018
Filing Number
WP/24438/2018
Filing Date
24-Aug-2018
Registration No
WP/11966/2018
Registration Date
17-Oct-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. KASHI RAM BORKAR
Adv. Dayanand Chandrakant Awari
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER AND ORS. Advocate - JAGDISH ARADWAD REDDY, RESP NO.6,NO. 3, 4,Deepak R More
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Kashi Ram Borkar in default on May 8, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite multiple opportunities. No substantive hearing on the merits took place due to the petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2020
For Admission -Fresh (Cmis)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
18-Apr-2019
For Admission
Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)
-
19-Oct-2018
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
19-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11966/2018
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Kashi Ram Borkar in default on May 8, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite multiple opportunities. No substantive hearing on the merits took place due to the petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts