M/S. D CORP AGRO FOODS PVT LTD AND ANR vs BANK OF BARODA AND ORS Advocate - Rathina Maravarman — WP/10869/2025

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010386912025

Filing Number

WP/24604/2025

Filing Date

18-Jul-2025

Registration No

WP/10869/2025

Registration Date

06-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. D CORP AGRO FOODS PVT LTD AND ANR

    Adv. Ajit A Kocharekar A A KOCHAREKAR

  2. 2.GAJANAN RAMAKANT DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA AND ORS Advocate - Rathina Maravarman

  2. 2.DURGESH GAJANAN DESAI, DIRECTOR OF M/S. D CORP AGRO FOODS PVT LTD.

  3. 3.UDITA GAJANAN DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court corrected a typographical error in its previous order dated 27.03.2026, where 'DRT-II, Mumbai' was erroneously recorded as 'DRAT' in paragraph 28. The corrected order was to be uploaded on the court's website, and the praecipe (application) was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  15. 03-Oct-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  16. 17-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  19. 13-Aug-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  20. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10869/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court corrected a typographical error in its previous order dated 27.03.2026, where 'DRT-II, Mumbai' was erroneously recorded as 'DRAT' in paragraph 28. The corrected order was to be uploaded on the court's website, and the praecipe (application) was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case