SMT. AAISHA ARIF SHAIKH AND ORS. vs RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THANE OFFICE — IA/2366/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: --Allowed To be withdrawn on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010384272025

Filing Number

IA/24415/2025

Filing Date

16-Jul-2025

Registration No

IA/2366/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed To be withdrawn

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. AAISHA ARIF SHAIKH AND ORS.

    Adv. Amrin Aslam Khan

  2. 2.AFSHIYA ARIF SHAIK

  3. 3.HAFIZA YAKUB SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THANE OFFICE

  2. 2.NAGENDRA K. DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Reliance General Insurance Company Limited's withdrawal of First Appeal No. 853 of 2019 against respondent Aaisha Arif Shaikh. The court directed transfer of any security deposit to the concerned MACT, granted refund of court fees per rules, and vacated any interim relief previously granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Sep-2025

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 14-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  6. 16-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Reliance General Insurance Company Limited's withdrawal of First Appeal No. 853 of 2019 against respondent Aaisha Arif Shaikh. The court directed transfer of any security deposit to the concerned MACT, granted refund of court fees per rules, and vacated any interim relief previously granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case