SUKANYA AJINKYA GAIKWAD vs AJINKYA RAMAKANT GAIKWAD Advocate - VYAS HITESH PURUSHOTTAM — WP/11342/2025

Case under Family Court Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed off as Withdrawn on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010379792025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/24113/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

WP/11342/2025

Registration Date

22-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

GUARDIANSHIP ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed off as Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SUKANYA AJINKYA GAIKWAD

Adv. Ajinkya M Udane

Respondent(s)

AJINKYA RAMAKANT GAIKWAD Advocate - VYAS HITESH PURUSHOTTAM

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR

28-07-2025

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

12-09-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

23-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION /HEARING

13-03-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

13-02-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR

The High Court of Bombay allowed Sukanya Ajinkya Gaikwad's writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application for interim relief before the trial court. The court permitted this withdrawal on the condition that any subsequent application for interim relief filed in the trial court will be decided on its own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed Sukanya Ajinkya Gaikwad's writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application for interim relief before the trial court. The court permitted this withdrawal on the condition that any subsequent application for interim relief filed in the trial court will be decided on its own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case