MR. ROBIN KUMAR vs MRS. PRAJAKTA KUMAR — RPR/3/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010372822025

e-Filing Number

10-07-2025

Filing Number

RPR/23659/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

RPR/3/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. ROBIN KUMAR

    Adv. Pushpa Thapa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MRS. PRAJAKTA KUMAR

  2. 2.ANIL P KUMAR

  3. 3.GREEN OAKS POULTRY FARM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay disposed of Mr. Robin Kumar's Review Petition by allowing its withdrawal on May 5, 2026, granting him liberty to pursue alternative proceedings as advised. The court order does not detail the underlying merits, as the petitioner's counsel elected to withdraw rather than proceed with the review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RPR/3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay disposed of Mr. Robin Kumar's Review Petition by allowing its withdrawal on May 5, 2026, granting him liberty to pursue alternative proceedings as advised. The court order does not detail the underlying merits, as the petitioner's counsel elected to withdraw rather than proceed with the review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case