KALIKA HIRAMAN UKANDE vs THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ANR — WP/10289/2022
Case under Parents and Sr. Citizen Act 2007 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010345242022
Filing Number
WP/20419/2022
Filing Date
19-08-2022
Registration No
WP/10289/2022
Registration Date
26-08-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALIKA HIRAMAN UKANDE
Adv. VIJAY S THAKUR
Respondent(s)
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ANR
MRS. SOJARBAI NAMDEV UKANDE
Adv. Ajay Corriea-MAH/539/2002
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
AT 2.30 P.M.
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS (AWAIT SERVICE)
AT 2.30 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-08-2022 | AT 2.30 P.M. |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 25-11-2022 | FOR ORDERS (AWAIT SERVICE) |
| 30-08-2022 | AT 2.30 P.M. |
Orders
The Bombay High Court upheld the Additional Collector's order directing petitioner Kalika Hiraman Ukande to hand over possession of Room No.319 in Siddhivinayak Building, Bandra, to senior citizen Sojarbai Ukande under the Senior Citizen's Welfare Act, 2007. The court rejected petitioner's reliance on consent terms agreed before the Metropolitan Magistrate, holding they merged into and were superseded by the June 1, 2022 order, which had already been implemented with Sojarbai in exclusive possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Additional Collector's order directing petitioner Kalika Hiraman Ukande to hand over possession of Room No.319 in Siddhivinayak Building, Bandra, to senior citizen Sojarbai Ukande under the Senior Citizen's Welfare Act, 2007. The court rejected petitioner's reliance on consent terms agreed before the Metropolitan Magistrate, holding they merged into and were superseded by the June 1, 2022 order, which had already been implemented with Sojarbai in exclusive possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts