MOHD. MOZAHIDDIN AZADA AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ORS — WP/8803/2025

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section N. Disposed: --Dismissed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010345112025

Filing Number

WP/21869/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

WP/8803/2025

Registration Date

30-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Dismissed

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section N

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. MOZAHIDDIN AZADA AND ORS

    Adv. Omkar Nagwekar

  2. 2.RASHIDA KHATUA MOHAMMAD AZAD

  3. 3.AR CREATION, SOLE PROPRIETOR THROUGH MR. MOHAMMAD MOZAHIDDIN AZAD

  4. 4.AR CREATION, SOLE PROPRIETOR THROUGH, RASHIDA KHATUA MOHAMMAD AZAD

  5. 5.NURSABA ENTERPRISES THROUGH, MNURSABA A AZAD

  6. 6.NURSABA TAHIDUL HASSAN AZAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ORS

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANE

  3. 3.CITY UNION BANK LTD

    Adv. M SEELAN P

  4. 4.CITY UNION BANK LTD MUMBAI

    Adv. M SEELAN P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed three consolidated writ petitions filed by borrowers against a bank's debt recovery proceedings, finding that the petitioners had misused the court's indulgence by failing to submit a promised payment schedule despite multiple opportunities. The court held that writ petitions cannot be entertained when statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act (2002) are available, and that courts cannot compel banks to accept one-time settlement offers from defaulting borrowers, vacating the interim order dated 1st July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  16. 01-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  17. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  21. 05-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  22. 24-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  23. 24-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  25. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8803/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed three consolidated writ petitions filed by borrowers against a bank's debt recovery proceedings, finding that the petitioners had misused the court's indulgence by failing to submit a promised payment schedule despite multiple opportunities. The court held that writ petitions cannot be entertained when statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act (2002) are available, and that courts cannot compel banks to accept one-time settlement offers from defaulting borrowers, vacating the interim order dated 1st July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case