M/S.SAI ART PRINTERS, MUMBAI THR.ITS PROPRIETOR MR.SADANAND SHEENA BANGERA vs THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN., MUMBAI AND ANR. — HCBM10344032021
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act Section 82. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010344032021
Filing Number
FA/18907/2021
Filing Date
04-Oct-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S.SAI ART PRINTERS, MUMBAI THR.ITS PROPRIETOR MR.SADANAND SHEENA BANGERA
Adv. Adv. Manan Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN., MUMBAI AND ANR.
-
2.THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN., MUMBAI
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Court Order Summary Appeal Dismissed. The Bombay High Court dismissed First Appeal (ST.) No. 18907 of 2021 filed by Sadanand Sheena Bangera against the ESI Court's order, holding that no substantial question of law was raised and the issues were purely factual matters. The Court found the appellant failed to produce evidence regarding employee numbers during July 2009-2013 and did not comply with ESI notices, thus the appeal could not be entertained under Section 82 of the ESI Act, 1948. The accompanying Interim Application No. 2338 of 2022 was also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Dismissal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
28-Jun-2022
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre
-
28-Jun-2022
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre
-
12-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF
-
12-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2021
Case filed
Court Order Summary Appeal Dismissed. The Bombay High Court dismissed First Appeal (ST.) No. 18907 of 2021 filed by Sadanand Sheena Bangera against the ESI Court's order, holding that no substantial question of law was raised and the issues were purely factual matters. The Court found the appellant failed to produce evidence regarding employee numbers during July 2009-2013 and did not comply with ESI notices, thus the appeal could not be entertained under Section 82 of the ESI Act, 1948. The accompanying Interim Application No. 2338 of 2022 was also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts