MR. ZAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ANR ANIL KUMAR SINGH vs AMIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ORS Advocate - S S KHARAT — WP/10529/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010339732022
Filing Number
WP/20080/2022
Filing Date
17-Aug-2022
Registration No
WP/10529/2022
Registration Date
05-Sep-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR. ZAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ANR ANIL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ORS Advocate - S S KHARAT
-
2.TAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH
Adv. S S KHARAT
-
3.SHABANA SHAHIR SHAIKH
Adv. S S KHARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by Zahir Nazir Shaikh and Anil Kumar Singh, setting aside the City Civil Court's April 2022 orders that rejected their applications for impleadment as defendants. The court found the petitioners were necessary parties to the suit since the plaintiffs had directly alleged they conducted unauthorized construction of additional floors in the building, making their participation essential to defend against these allegations and demonstrate the construction's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Due Admission - 2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
12-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
12-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
05-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
27-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
10-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
18-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
17-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2025
First On Board (Fob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
13-Feb-2024
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
06-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
06-Feb-2024
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
29-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
22-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
27-Mar-2023
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
03-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
13-Feb-2023
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
24-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
20-Dec-2022
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
29-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
29-Nov-2022
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde
-
06-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath ShindeView PDF
-
06-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10529/2022
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by Zahir Nazir Shaikh and Anil Kumar Singh, setting aside the City Civil Court's April 2022 orders that rejected their applications for impleadment as defendants. The court found the petitioners were necessary parties to the suit since the plaintiffs had directly alleged they conducted unauthorized construction of additional floors in the building, making their participation essential to defend against these allegations and demonstrate the construction's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts