SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. vs SMT. TEJKUMARI SHAMSHER BAHADUR YADAV AND ORS — CAF/1449/2016

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Sep-2016

CNR: HCBM010337972014

Filing Number

CAF/22601/2014

Filing Date

22-Aug-2014

Registration No

CAF/1449/2016

Registration Date

13-Apr-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Sub-Category

INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.

    Adv. singh sarvanad r

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. TEJKUMARI SHAMSHER BAHADUR YADAV AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Shriram General Insurance's appeal against a Commissioner's order directing payment of Rs. 8,61,120/- with 12% interest, upholding the doctrine of indoor management since fraud occurred within the insurance company's office. However, the court reduced the payable amount by Rs. 5,75,000/- already received by claimants under a separate MACP award, as double compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Sep-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  4. 30-Aug-2016

    —View PDF

  5. 09-Aug-2016

    —View PDF

  6. 19-Jul-2016

    —View PDF

  7. 28-Jun-2016

    —View PDF

  8. 07-Jun-2016

    —View PDF

  9. 25-Apr-2016

    —View PDF

  10. 22-Aug-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1449/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Shriram General Insurance's appeal against a Commissioner's order directing payment of Rs. 8,61,120/- with 12% interest, upholding the doctrine of indoor management since fraud occurred within the insurance company's office. However, the court reduced the payable amount by Rs. 5,75,000/- already received by claimants under a separate MACP award, as double compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case