THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI vs SHRI. RAMSANEHI M. YADAV AND ANR.. — CAF/1487/2016
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010336602015
Filing Number
CAF/22299/2015
Filing Date
03-Aug-2015
Registration No
CAF/1487/2016
Registration Date
15-Apr-2016
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Sub-Category
GARNISHEE NOTICE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. U. H. DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI. RAMSANEHI M. YADAV AND ANR..
-
2.SMT. PHULDAI R. YADAV
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
-
04-May-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF
Case Outcome Summary: The case was adjourned. The court directed the applicant's advocate to effect service of notices on unserved respondents within two weeks (excluding summer vacation) as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to complete service would result in dismissal of the Civil Application on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Oct-2020
For Orders
Registrar(judicial II Fa)
- 05-Mar-2020
- 30-Jan-2020
- 09-Dec-2019
-
07-Nov-2019
Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF
-
07-Nov-2019
For Orders
Registrar(judicial II Fa)
-
03-Oct-2019
Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF
-
03-Oct-2019
For Orders (Unserved Notice)
Registrar(judicial II Fa)
- 22-Aug-2019
- 18-Jul-2019
- 13-Jun-2019
-
03-Apr-2019
Registrar(judicial II Fa)View PDF
-
03-Apr-2019
For Orders
Registrar(judicial II Fa)
- 19-Mar-2019
-
07-Mar-2019
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Pushpa Virendra GanediwalaView PDF
-
07-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Aug-2015
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/1487/2016
Case Outcome Summary: The case was adjourned. The court directed the applicant's advocate to effect service of notices on unserved respondents within two weeks (excluding summer vacation) as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to complete service would result in dismissal of the Civil Application on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts