SHALINI TULSIRAM DONGRE SHRI H.E. PALWE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APEAL/1042/2008

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Sep-2008

CNR: HCBM010331922008

Filing Number

APEAL/1042/2008

Filing Date

04-Oct-2008

Registration No

APEAL/1042/2008

Registration Date

04-Oct-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHALINI TULSIRAM DONGRE SHRI H.E. PALWE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.MAHADEO SHANKAR KATAKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court transferred the criminal appeal to the Sessions Court, finding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear the victim's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran recognizing victims' statutory right to appeal acquittals under CrPC Section 372. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  7. 17-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  8. 13-Oct-2008

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  9. 04-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/1042/2008

  10. 19-Sep-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court transferred the criminal appeal to the Sessions Court, finding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear the victim's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran recognizing victims' statutory right to appeal acquittals under CrPC Section 372. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case