THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD SHRI. S.M. DANGE vs DINESHKUMAR J. DUBEY AND ANR — FA/1760/2009
Case under Workmens Compensation Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010331112007
Next Hearing
09th November 2009
Filing Number
FA/23612/2007
Filing Date
27-09-2007
Registration No
FA/1760/2009
Registration Date
19-11-2009
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
WORKMEN COMPENSATION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD SHRI. S.M. DANGE
Respondent(s)
DINESHKUMAR J. DUBEY AND ANR
Adv. R. NO. 2 SERVED. 1123
SHRI JEELAJEET B. DUBEY,
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
FOR ADMISSION (OBJ. NOT REMOVED)
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-11-2009 | FOR ADMISSION (OBJ. NOT REMOVED) |
| 20-11-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 12-11-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 08-10-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 02-05-2024 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the labor court's award of Rs. 5,20,584 in compensation to an injured driver. The court held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant and his father (vehicle owner), despite being relatives and lacking written documentation, as the father admitted employment in his written statement and issued a wage certificate confirming Rs. 4,000 monthly salary, which satisfied the burden of proof under the Workmen's Compensation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the labor court's award of Rs. 5,20,584 in compensation to an injured driver. The court held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant and his father (vehicle owner), despite being relatives and lacking written documentation, as the father admitted employment in his written statement and issued a wage certificate confirming Rs. 4,000 monthly salary, which satisfied the burden of proof under the Workmen's Compensation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts